All Comparisons
othersame year

2014 Toyota RAV4 vs 2014 Honda CR-V Comparison - Which Should You Buy?

Detailed comparison of 2014 Toyota RAV4 vs 2014 Honda CR-V. Compare specs, reliability, features, and value to find the best choice for your needs.

2014 Toyota

RAV4

View Full Guide →

2014 Honda

CR-V

View Full Guide →

Specifications Comparison

Spec2014 Toyota RAV42014 Honda CR-V
Horsepower176 hp185 hp
MPG (City)2423
MPG (Highway)3131
MSRP (New)$24,200$23,775
Towing Capacity1,500 lbs1,500 lbs

Overview

The 2014 Toyota RAV4 and 2014 Honda CR-V are commonly compared because they sit at the heart of the compact crossover market: efficient, practical, and sized for daily driving without feeling like a penalty box. Both target buyers who want a higher seating position and flexible cargo space, but don’t need a three-row SUV. Shoppers usually cross-shop them for reliability reputation, fuel economy, cargo usability, and long-term costs. The RAV4 tends to appeal to buyers who want stronger acceleration and available safety/tech features, while the CR-V often wins over drivers who prioritize a smoother ride, simpler ergonomics, and strong real-world efficiency. HEAD-TO-

Performance Comparison

In everyday driving, the RAV4 usually feels more eager off the line, while the CR-V prioritizes smoothness and predictable responses. The RAV4’s 6-speed automatic generally keeps the 2.5L in a more useful part of the powerband during passing and highway merging, which helps it feel stronger at mid speeds. The CR-V’s 5-speed automatic is tuned for efficiency and smooth shifts, but it can feel a bit busier or slower to respond during kickdowns. Acceleration (0-60 mph, typical published results) - 2014 Toyota RAV4 2.5L: approximately 8.3–8.8 seconds (varies by FWD/AWD and test source) - 2014 Honda CR-V 2.4L: approximately 8.5–9.1 seconds (varies by FWD/AWD and test source) Handling and ride - RAV4: Steering is light and easy in town, with a slightly firmer, more “tied down” feel at highway speeds than older RAV4 generations. It can feel a bit more upright and less car-like over broken pavement, and road noise is noticeable on coarse asphalt. - CR-V: Typically the more comfortable, compliant ride, with well-controlled body motions over bumps. Steering is also light, but the CR-V often feels more cohesive and refined at normal speeds. Neither is sporty like a hot hatch, but the CR-V tends to be the calmer long-distance companion. AWD behavior and winter use Both use on-demand AWD systems suited for traction in rain, light snow, and gravel roads rather than serious off-roading. With good tires, both do well for typical winter commuting; ground clearance and approach angles are modest compared to off-road-focused SUVs.

Reliability & Common Issues

2014 Toyota RAV4 (common issues) 1) Torque converter/transmission shudder (some vehicles, often higher mileage) - Some owners report a shudder or vibration during light acceleration or at highway speeds, sometimes attributed to torque converter behavior or transmission fluid condition. It’s not universal, but it can appear as mileage climbs (often reported beyond ~60,000–100,000 miles). A thorough test drive at steady throttle around 35–55 mph can help reveal it. 2) Water leaks (roof rails/sunroof areas, depending on equipment) - Intermittent water intrusion is reported by some owners, especially in vehicles with roof rails or sunroof drains that clog. Symptoms include damp headliner, wet carpet, or musty odor. 3) Suspension wear and noises with age - Strut mounts, bushings, and sway bar links can develop clunks/rattles as these vehicles age past ~80,000–120,000 miles, especially in rough-road regions. Typically not catastrophic, but affects refinement and can add maintenance cost. 2014 Honda CR-V (common issues) 1) Vibration at idle / rough idle complaints - Some 2012–2014-era CR-Vs are known for noticeable vibration at idle, often more of a comfort complaint than a failure. It can be more apparent with the A/C on or in gear at a stop. A test drive with extended idling is worthwhile. 2) A/C compressor and system leaks (age-related) - As mileage and years accumulate, A/C performance issues can appear (weak cooling, compressor noise, refrigerant leaks). This is a common wear-area in many vehicles, but it’s worth verifying on a used CR-V, especially in hot climates. 3) Premature brake wear on some examples - Some owners report faster-than-expected brake pad/rotor wear depending on driving patterns (urban stop-and-go). Not a deal-breaker, but it affects running costs and is easy to check during inspection.

Interior & Features

Interior quality and ergonomics - RAV4: Durable, straightforward cabin designed for easy cleaning and long-term wear. Some hard plastics are noticeable, but controls are simple. Visibility is generally good, and the driving position is upright. - CR-V: Often feels more “car-like” and airy, with excellent outward visibility and an intuitive layout. Seat comfort is a strong point, and many drivers find the CR-V’s controls more naturally placed. Technology and convenience features (typical availability by trim) 2014 RAV4 - Available touchscreen infotainment with Bluetooth, navigation on higher trims, and an available power liftgate. - Depending on trim/package, available safety tech included items like blind-spot monitoring and rear cross-traffic alert (availability varies widely by trim and options). 2014 CR-V - Bluetooth and rearview camera availability depends on trim; higher trims offered touchscreen and navigation. - Honda’s LaneWatch camera system was available on certain trims, providing a passenger-side blind-spot view when signaling. Cargo space and usability (behind 2nd row / max) - 2014 Toyota RAV4: about 38.4 cu ft / 73.4 cu ft - 2014 Honda CR-V: about 37.2 cu ft / 70.9 cu ft In practice, both are excellent for strollers, Costco runs, and luggage. The RAV4 has a slight edge on raw volume, while the CR-V’s lower load floor and cabin packaging often make it feel very easy to load and live with. Passenger comfort Both seat five. Rear-seat space is generous for the class, but the CR-V is often preferred for ride comfort and overall cabin calmness. The RAV4’s seats and driving position work well for many body types, but road noise can be more apparent at highway speeds.

Value & Cost of Ownership

Purchase prices (new and used) - New (2014): Both typically transacted in the mid-$20,000s depending on trim and AWD. The CR-V’s base MSRP was slightly lower, but transaction prices overlapped heavily once similarly equipped. - Used (today): Pricing varies heavily by mileage, trim, accident history, and region. As a broad market pattern, both hold value well. Expect a clean, higher-mileage example (120k–170k miles) to be priced in the high single digits to low teens, and lower-mileage, clean-history examples to climb into the mid-teens depending on trim and AWD. Insurance costs Insurance is usually similar between the two, with minor differences by ZIP code and driver profile. The CR-V is often slightly cheaper to insure on average due to strong safety record and repair patterns, but the difference is typically small compared to the impact of driver age, claim history, and coverage limits. Maintenance and repair costs - RAV4: Generally low routine maintenance costs (fluids, brakes, tires). Watch for potential transmission shudder complaints on some higher-mileage vehicles and for suspension wear as they age. - CR-V: Also low routine costs. Plan for potential A/C work as the vehicle ages and verify the engine runs smoothly at idle. Brake service frequency can be higher for some driving styles. Resale value Both are among the best in the segment for resale retention. Historically, CR-V and RAV4 trade places depending on market conditions, but neither is a “depreciation trap.” Condition, service records, and clean title matter more than small model-to-model differences.

The Verdict

Best for families 2014 Honda CR-V. It’s typically the better family pick for ride comfort, easy visibility, and a cabin that feels calm and intuitive on long drives. It also has excellent rear-seat usability and a very practical cargo area. Best for commuters Tie, with a slight lean toward the 2014 Toyota RAV4 if you value passing power and the 6-speed’s responsiveness, and toward the 2014 Honda CR-V if you prioritize a smoother ride and stress-free controls. Fuel economy is extremely close (often within 1 mpg). Best for enthusiasts 2014 Toyota RAV4. Neither is an enthusiast SUV, but the RAV4 generally feels quicker in real-world passing and can feel a bit more decisive with its 6-speed automatic. If “enthusiast” means sharper driving feel, the edge is still modest, but it goes to the RAV4. Best value overall 2014 Honda CR-V for most shoppers, because it combines strong reliability, excellent day-to-day comfort, and consistently high resale value. Choose the 2014 Toyota RAV4 instead if you find a better-maintained example at the same price, want a bit more cargo volume, or prefer the RAV4’s powertrain behavior on the highway. The best move for either is to buy based on service history, a pre-purchase inspection, and a test drive that includes highway cruising, low-speed bumps, and extended idling with the A/C on.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more reliable, 2014 Toyota RAV4 or 2014 Honda CR-V?

Both vehicles have their strengths. Check our detailed reliability section above for specific issues to watch for in each model.

Which has better resale value?

Resale value depends on condition, mileage, and market demand. Generally, 2014 Toyota RAV4 tends to hold value well.

Which is better for towing?

Neither vehicle is designed primarily for towing. Check manufacturer specs for light towing capabilities.

Get Your Complete Owner's Guide

Create a personalized guidebook for any of these vehicles with detailed maintenance schedules, specs, and more.

Create Your Guidebook