All Comparisons
othersame year

2017 Toyota RAV4 vs 2017 Honda CR-V Comparison - Which Should You Buy?

Detailed comparison of 2017 Toyota RAV4 vs 2017 Honda CR-V. Compare specs, reliability, features, and value to find the best choice for your needs.

2017 Toyota

RAV4

View Full Guide →

2017 Honda

CR-V

View Full Guide →

Specifications Comparison

Spec2017 Toyota RAV42017 Honda CR-V
Horsepower176 hp190 hp
MPG (City)2328
MPG (Highway)3034
MSRP (New)$24,500$24,000
Towing Capacity1,500 lbs1,500 lbs
Payload Capacity1,015 lbs850 lbs

Overview

The 2017 Toyota RAV4 and 2017 Honda CR-V are commonly cross-shopped because they sit at the heart of the compact SUV market: similar size, similar pricing when new, and strong reputations for reliability and resale value. Both appeal to buyers who want a practical daily driver with good fuel economy, easy maneuverability, and flexible cargo space without stepping up to a larger midsize SUV. The RAV4 tends to attract shoppers prioritizing a simple, proven powertrain and strong long-term dependability, while the CR-V often pulls in buyers who want a more modern driving feel, stronger torque at low speeds, and class-leading space efficiency. Key decision factors usually come down to fuel economy, cargo/passenger packaging, driving refinement, and which set of known issues feels more manageable for a long-term ownership plan. HEAD-TO-

Performance Comparison

The 2017 RAV4 uses a conventional 6-speed automatic with a naturally aspirated 2.5L that feels predictable and durable, but it’s not quick. In real-world driving, it delivers adequate passing power once the transmission kicks down, yet it can feel busy and louder when pushed. Typical 0-60 mph times land around 8.3 to 8.8 seconds depending on drivetrain and test conditions. The 2017 CR-V’s performance depends heavily on engine choice. The base 2.4L feels smooth and reasonably responsive, with 0-60 mph typically around 8.6 to 9.0 seconds. The 1.5L turbo is the standout for everyday drivability: it has stronger low-end torque feel around town, generally better fuel economy, and quicker real-world merging. Many road tests put the 1.5T at roughly 7.3 to 7.8 seconds 0-60 mph (FWD often quicker than AWD). The CVT in both CR-V engines keeps the engine in its power band, which helps efficiency but can feel “rubber-band” like under hard acceleration. Handling and ride quality also differ. The CR-V usually feels more refined and composed over broken pavement with lighter, more car-like steering, and it tends to be easier to place in corners. The RAV4 rides firmly enough to feel stable, but it’s more utilitarian in steering feel and can transmit more road noise. Neither is a true enthusiast SUV, but the CR-V is generally the more pleasant vehicle to drive daily, especially in 1.5T form.

Reliability & Common Issues

2017 Toyota RAV4 common issues 1) Torque converter/transmission shudder or hesitation (6-speed automatic) - Some owners report shuddering or a vibration-like feel at steady speeds (often 35–50 mph range) or during light acceleration. Not every vehicle is affected, but it can show up in mid-mileage ownership (roughly 40,000–90,000 miles). In some cases fluid service, software updates, or torque-converter-related work is needed. 2) Water leaks from roof rails/roof area (where equipped) - Reports include water intrusion due to roof rail mounting points or seals, sometimes noticed after heavy rain or car washes. This is intermittent but worth checking by inspecting headliner edges and looking for musty odors. 3) Infotainment and Bluetooth quirks - Entune-era systems can be slow, have pairing glitches, or reboot issues. This is more of a usability complaint than a mechanical reliability problem, but it’s common enough to mention. 2017 Honda CR-V common issues 1) 1.5L turbo fuel dilution concerns (1.5T models) - Some owners report oil smelling like fuel and oil level rising, particularly with repeated short trips in cold weather where the engine doesn’t fully warm up. Concerns are most discussed in 2017–2018 model years. Many vehicles run fine long-term with more frequent oil changes and driving patterns that fully warm the engine, but it’s a key due-diligence item: check maintenance history, oil change intervals, and consider oil analysis if buying used. 2) Battery drain/electrical complaints - Some 2017 CR-Vs have reports of premature battery failure or parasitic draw symptoms (slow cranking, dead battery after sitting). This can show up within the first few years and may be tied to vehicle usage patterns and accessory systems. 3) Infotainment and driver-assist calibration frustrations (higher trims) - Owners sometimes report head unit freezes, CarPlay/Android Auto connectivity issues, and occasional false alerts or sensitivity complaints with Honda Sensing systems. Again, more annoyance than catastrophic failure, but it impacts day-to-day satisfaction.

Interior & Features

The 2017 CR-V is one of the segment leaders for packaging. Passenger space is excellent for a compact SUV, especially rear legroom, and the seating position feels airy with good outward visibility. Cargo room is also a strong point: about 39.2 cubic feet behind the rear seats and roughly 75.8 cubic feet with the seats folded (varies slightly by measurement method and trim). Interior design is modern and functional, and the EX/EX-L/Touring trims bring desirable upgrades like power driver seat, heated seats, remote start (trim-dependent), and a power tailgate (higher trims). The 2017 RAV4’s cabin is durable and straightforward, with controls that are easy to use and materials that prioritize longevity over upscale feel. Cargo space is competitive but typically trails the CR-V: about 38.4 cubic feet behind the rear seats and around 73.4 cubic feet folded. Toyota’s available safety suite (Toyota Safety Sense P on many trims) is a major plus, often including adaptive cruise control and lane departure alert depending on trim/package. Infotainment usability can be a weak spot versus Honda, especially for smartphone integration expectations, and road noise tends to be more noticeable in the RAV4 at highway speeds. In comfort terms, both are good family vehicles, but the CR-V generally feels more spacious in the second row and more flexible for bulky cargo. The RAV4 counters with a simpler overall layout and a reputation for taking wear well over time (seats, trim, and switches tend to hold up).

Value & Cost of Ownership

When new, both started in the mid-$20k range, with real-world transaction prices depending heavily on trim and incentives. In today’s used market, prices vary widely by mileage, trim, accident history, and region, but typical ranges often look like: - 2017 RAV4: roughly $14,000–$22,000 - 2017 CR-V: roughly $15,000–$24,000 CR-Vs can command a bit more on the used market because of fuel economy and space, though the RAV4’s reliability reputation also supports strong resale. Fuel and maintenance costs - Fuel: The CR-V, especially the 1.5T, usually wins at the pump by a noticeable margin (often 3–6 mpg better than a comparable RAV4), which adds up for commuters. - Maintenance: Both are relatively affordable. The RAV4’s conventional automatic and naturally aspirated engine are simple and typically forgiving. The CR-V’s 1.5T adds turbo complexity and the fuel-dilution discussion leads many owners to shorten oil-change intervals, slightly increasing routine maintenance cost. - Tires/brakes: Similar costs; AWD versions of either can increase tire replacement sensitivity due to tread-matching requirements. Insurance Insurance costs are usually similar since both are mainstream compact SUVs with strong safety performance, but trim level (Touring/limited equivalents), driver profile, and local repair rates matter more than brand. In many markets, the CR-V can be marginally higher due to higher average vehicle value, but this isn’t universal. Resale value Both hold value well. The RAV4 historically has extremely strong long-term resale and demand, while the CR-V also performs near the top of the segment. If long-term depreciation resistance is the priority, the RAV4 typically has a slight edge, but a well-kept CR-V (especially with complete service records) remains an excellent resale bet.

The Verdict

Best for families: 2017 Honda CR-V The CR-V’s rear-seat space, cargo flexibility, and excellent fuel economy make it the more family-friendly all-rounder. If choosing the 1.5T, prioritize vehicles with documented oil changes and consider driving patterns (lots of short trips in cold climates deserve extra scrutiny). Best for commuters: 2017 Honda CR-V The CR-V’s EPA ratings (up to 28/34 mpg FWD with the 1.5T) are hard to ignore for high-mile drivers, and its quieter, more refined road manners make daily miles easier. Best for enthusiasts: 2017 Honda CR-V 1.5T (by default) Neither is sporty, but the CR-V 1.5T is noticeably quicker (often mid-7-second 0-60 range) and feels stronger in everyday acceleration. The RAV4 is more “appliance-like” in response, with less engaging power delivery. Best value overall: 2017 Toyota RAV4 If “value” means lowest stress ownership over 8–12 years, the RAV4’s simpler, proven powertrain and consistently strong reliability track record give it the edge. Choose the CR-V instead if maximizing space and fuel economy matters more and you’re comfortable being diligent about maintenance history (especially on 1.5T models).

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is more reliable, 2017 Toyota RAV4 or 2017 Honda CR-V?

Both vehicles have their strengths. Check our detailed reliability section above for specific issues to watch for in each model.

Which has better resale value?

Resale value depends on condition, mileage, and market demand. Generally, 2017 Toyota RAV4 tends to hold value well.

Which is better for towing?

Neither vehicle is designed primarily for towing. Check manufacturer specs for light towing capabilities.

Get Your Complete Owner's Guide

Create a personalized guidebook for any of these vehicles with detailed maintenance schedules, specs, and more.

Create Your Guidebook