2016 Ford Mustang vs 2016 Chevrolet Camaro
Reliability Side-by-Side
2016
Ford Mustang
Grade B
A potent performance car that offers strong value, but demands diligent maintenance and careful pre-purchase scrutiny, especially of the manual gearbox.
2016
Chevrolet Camaro
Grade C+
A potent performance machine where the automatic transmission is the primary point of concern, otherwise largely solid.
Best For
Best for Reliability
2016 Ford Mustang
Score 82/100 vs 78/100
Best for Lowest Annual Upkeep
2016 Ford Mustang
$400-600
Cost of Ownership
| Line Item | 2016 Ford Mustang★ | 2016 Chevrolet Camaro |
|---|---|---|
| Annual Maintenance | $400-600 | $500-800 |
| Moderate Repairs | $500-1,500 occasionally | $600-1,500 occasionally (e.g., transmission flush, carbon cleaning, larger brake job) |
| MPG (City/Hwy) | 16 / 25 | 17 / 28 |
| MSRP (New) | $32,395 | $36,905 |
Major-failure risk and insurance outlook for each vehicle are in their full reliability reports.
Biggest Risks on Each
2016 Ford Mustang
MT82 Manual Transmission
30,000-70,000 mi
Electrical System
40,000-80,000 mi
Rear Axle/Differential
50,000-90,000 mi
2016 Chevrolet Camaro
8-Speed Automatic Transmission (8L45/8L90)
20,000-80,000 mi
Infotainment System (MyLink)
Any mileage mi
Engine (V8 LT1 AFM Lifters)
70,000-120,000+ mi
Get the Full Report on Each
7-system breakdown, mileage danger zones, repair costs, and expert verdict for each vehicle.
$9.99 each · Instant delivery · No account required
Editorial Take
The 2016 Ford Mustang and 2016 Chevrolet Camaro represent the pinnacle of a long-standing rivalry, offering a compelling choice for enthusiasts seeking American performance and style. Both models introduced significant redesigns for their respective generations – the Mustang in 2015 and the Camaro in 2016 – bringing modern engineering to their iconic names. Consumers considering either vehicle are typically looking for an engaging driving experience, a powerful engine, and a distinctive aesthetic without venturing into exotic sports car territory. Key decision factors often revolve around specific performance metrics, interior design, daily usability, and overall value. HEAD-TO-
Reliability & Common Issues
Ford Mustang (2016): 1. Rear Axle Whine: Some owners, particularly of the GT models, have reported a discernible whine or hum from the rear differential or axle, typically noticeable at certain speeds or under light load. This can sometimes be mitigated by a differential fluid change, but in some cases, it may indicate a deeper component issue. 2. Electrical/Infotainment Glitches: Minor issues with the SYNC 3 infotainment system, such as freezing or Bluetooth connectivity problems, have been reported. While often resolved with software updates or resets, they can be an intermittent annoyance. 3. EcoBoost Engine Misfires (Less Common for 2016, but noted in S550 generation): While less prevalent in the 2016 model year compared to some earlier EcoBoost implementations, occasional reports of misfires or rough idling have surfaced, sometimes linked to spark plugs or coil packs. Chevrolet Camaro (2016): 1. HVAC System Issues: Some 2016 Camaro owners have experienced problems with the heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system. This can range from noisy blower motors to blend door actuator failures, leading to inconsistent cabin temperatures or reduced airflow. 2. Infotainment System Freezing: Similar to the Mustang, the MyLink infotainment system in the Camaro has been known to occasionally freeze or become unresponsive, requiring a full system reboot to restore functionality. 3. Minor Interior Rattles/Squeaks: As an all-new platform, some initial production models exhibited minor interior rattles or squeaks, particularly from the dashboard or trim pieces. These are typically small annoyances rather than significant mechanical failures.
Value & Cost of Ownership
When new, the 2016 Mustang and Camaro had very competitive starting MSRPs, with the Mustang V6 slightly undercutting the Camaro 2.0T by about $1,500. For V8 models, the Mustang GT also had a lower starting price than the Camaro SS by approximately $4,500, offering a value proposition at the top end. In the used market (as of 2024), prices for a 2016 Mustang can range from $15,000-$20,000 for V6/EcoBoost models, and $25,000-$35,000 for GT models, with Shelby GT350s commanding $45,000-$60,000+. Similarly, a used 2016 Camaro 2.0T or V6 typically sells for $16,000-$23,000, while SS models are usually in the $28,000-$40,000 range. Both have demonstrated strong resale values within the sports car segment, holding their worth well over time. Insurance costs for both vehicles will be higher than average due to their performance nature and demographic. V8 models, particularly the SS and GT, will incur the highest premiums due to their power and increased risk factors. Generally, the Camaro SS might see slightly higher rates in some regions due to its higher base horsepower and perceived track focus, but this can vary widely by individual driver and location. Maintenance costs for both are relatively similar and affordable for their class. Both benefit from widely available parts and a large network of dealerships and independent mechanics. Routine oil changes, tire rotations, and brake pad replacements are comparable. More specialized components for the Shelby GT350 or Camaro SS (e.g., track-oriented brakes, adaptive suspensions) can be more expensive to replace or repair.
Editorial Verdict
Choosing between the 2016 Ford Mustang and 2016 Chevrolet Camaro often comes down to personal preference for driving dynamics, styling, and daily usability. Best for families: Neither vehicle is truly suited for family duty beyond perhaps a very young child in the front seat if equipped with proper safety cut-offs. However, if forced to choose, the 2016 Mustang offers slightly more usable rear seats and a larger, more accessible trunk (13.5 cubic feet vs. 9.1 cubic feet for the Camaro), making it marginally more practical for occasional needs. Best for commuters: The Ford Mustang EcoBoost (22 city / 31 highway MPG) or Chevrolet Camaro 2.0T (22 city / 31 highway MPG) are both excellent choices for daily commuting. They offer comparable fuel economy, sufficient power for daily driving, and generally comfortable rides. The Mustang might have a slight edge due to its better outward visibility, making it less strenuous in city traffic. Best for enthusiasts: The Chevrolet Camaro SS (455 hp V8) is arguably the enthusiast's choice for its more precise handling, superior chassis dynamics, and track-ready feel, especially when equipped with Magnetic Ride Control. Its lighter, stiffer platform provides a truly engaging experience. For the ultimate enthusiast, the Mustang Shelby GT350 (526 hp V8) offers an exotic flat-plane crank engine and incredible track capabilities, but it sits in a different price and performance bracket. Best value overall: The 2016 Ford Mustang EcoBoost strikes an excellent balance of iconic styling, strong performance (310 hp), and impressive fuel economy, all at a competitive price point, particularly in the used market. It offers a well-rounded package for those seeking a modern pony car experience without the higher costs of the V8 models.
Parts & Accessories for These Vehicles
Products for 2016 Ford Mustang
Products for 2016 Chevrolet Camaro
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.