2017 Ford Mustang, 2017 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2017 Dodge Challenger Comparison - Which Should You Buy?
Detailed comparison of 2017 Ford Mustang, 2017 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2017 Dodge Challenger. Compare specs, reliability, features, and value to find the best choice for your needs.
Specifications Comparison
| Spec | 2017 Ford Mustang | 2017 Chevrolet Camaro | 2017 Dodge Challenger |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 300-435 hp | 275-650 hp | 305-707 hp |
| MPG (City) | 15-22 | 16-22 | 13-19 |
| MPG (Highway) | 24-32 | 25-31 | 22-30 |
| MSRP (New) | $23,470 | $25,905 | $26,995 |
Overview
The 2017 Ford Mustang, 2017 Chevrolet Camaro, and 2017 Dodge Challenger are commonly compared because they deliver classic American performance at attainable prices, with trims ranging from efficient turbo/V6 models to big-horsepower V8s. Mustang tends to attract buyers who want balanced handling, modern tech, and broad engine choice, including a fuel-sipping turbo. Camaro is typically chosen by drivers who prioritize sharp chassis response and track-capable performance, even if day-to-day visibility and space take a hit. Challenger appeals to those who want the most muscle-car presence, the roomiest cabin, and straight-line power, especially with its 392 and Hellcat variants. Key decision factors usually come down to handling feel vs. comfort and space, engine preference (turbo/V6 vs. V8), running costs, and resale value. HEAD-TO-
Performance Comparison
In base form, these cars can look similar on paper, but their personalities are very different. Camaro is typically the most precise and confidence-inspiring in corners thanks to its Alpha platform, strong body control, and excellent steering response, while Mustang is close behind with a more playful balance and an easy-to-live-with ride/handling blend. Challenger is the comfort and straight-line cruiser of the trio: stable and planted, but heavier and less eager to change direction, especially in non-widebody trims. Typical 0–60 mph times (varies with tires, transmission, and conditions): - 2017 Mustang EcoBoost: about 5.5–5.9 seconds - 2017 Mustang GT 5.0: about 4.5–4.8 seconds (quicker with automatic and performance pack) - 2017 Camaro 2.0T: about 5.4–5.9 seconds - 2017 Camaro SS: about 4.0–4.3 seconds (automatic generally quickest) - 2017 Camaro ZL1: about 3.5–3.7 seconds - 2017 Challenger V6: about 5.8–6.2 seconds - 2017 Challenger R/T 5.7: about 5.0–5.3 seconds - 2017 Challenger 392: about 4.2–4.5 seconds - 2017 Challenger Hellcat: about 3.4–3.7 seconds Real-world takeaway: if back-road speed and track-day composure matter most, Camaro usually leads, Mustang is the best all-rounder, and Challenger shines when you want effortless torque, a big-cabin cruising feel, and headline horsepower in 392/Hellcat form.
Reliability & Common Issues
2017 FORD MUSTANG (COMMON ISSUES) - MT82 manual transmission complaints: Notchy shifting, occasional gear grind (often 2nd/3rd), and clutch feel issues are frequently reported on 2015–2017 Mustangs, sometimes showing up under 30,000–60,000 miles depending on driving style. - EcoBoost carbon buildup and misfires: Direct-injection 2.3L engines can develop intake valve carbon deposits over time (more noticeable past ~50,000–80,000 miles), potentially causing rough idle or reduced performance if not addressed. - Rear differential/axle noise: Some owners report whining or clunking from the rear end, especially on higher-mileage cars or those driven aggressively; fluid condition and backlash setup matter. 2017 CHEVROLET CAMARO (COMMON ISSUES) - A8 automatic “shudder” (8-speed automatic): Some 2016–2018 Camaro models with the 8-speed automatic report torque converter shudder/vibration at steady speeds, sometimes appearing as early as 10,000–40,000 miles; fixes range from fluid service to torque converter replacement. - Electrical/infotainment glitches: MyLink/Infotainment 3-era systems in this period can experience screen freezes, Bluetooth issues, or camera intermittency; usually nuisance-level but can be persistent. - Visibility-related wear/bumps: Not a mechanical failure, but the low roofline and high beltline contribute to more curb/bumper scrapes and wheel damage in real ownership compared with Mustang/Challenger. 2017 DODGE CHALLENGER (COMMON ISSUES) - Hemi lifter/cam wear risk (usage-dependent): Some Hemi V8s (5.7 and 6.4) have reports of lifter tick and cam wear, more commonly associated with poor oil-change habits, lots of idling, or high-mileage use (often appearing after ~60,000–100,000 miles in worst cases). - Interior/electrical niggles: Power accessory issues (window regulators, sensors, occasional warning lights) are more common than in some rivals; often intermittent rather than catastrophic. - Brake and tire wear on high-output trims: 392 and Hellcat models can consume rear tires and brake pads quickly; aggressive street driving can cut rear tire life to 10,000–20,000 miles depending on compound and alignment.
Interior & Features
Mustang’s cabin design is sporty and modern, with supportive front seats and a driving position that works well for a wide range of heights. Camaro feels the most “cockpit-like” with a low seating position and high sills; materials can be good in 2SS trims, but outward visibility is the biggest drawback for daily use. Challenger is the clear winner for space: it offers the most rear-seat legroom and the easiest rear-seat access of the three, making it the most realistic option for adults in back on shorter trips. Technology: all three offered strong options in 2017, including smartphone integration (Apple CarPlay/Android Auto availability depends on trim/package). Camaro and Mustang generally lead with more modern interface feel, while Challenger’s available Uconnect is widely liked for straightforward menus and responsiveness. Cargo: Challenger typically provides the largest trunk (around 16 cu ft), Mustang is usually in the ~13–14 cu ft range, and Camaro is smallest (around 9 cu ft) with a narrower opening, making bulky items harder to load.
Value & Cost of Ownership
New pricing favored Mustang at entry level, then Camaro, then Challenger, but transaction prices varied heavily with incentives and trims. On today’s used market, pricing depends more on engine and condition than badge: V8 models command a premium, and special trims (Mustang GT Performance Pack, Camaro SS 1LE, Challenger 392/Hellcat) can remain expensive due to demand. Insurance: typically highest for Camaro SS/ZL1 and Challenger 392/Hellcat due to power and claim history, with Mustang GT also elevated; four-cylinder and V6 trims are notably cheaper. Maintenance: routine costs are similar (oil, brakes, tires), but consumables jump sharply on V8 performance trims (wide tires, big brakes). Resale value: Mustang GT tends to hold value strongly because of broad demand; Challenger V8 models also hold well, especially special trims; Camaro resale can be more variable, partly due to practicality drawbacks and smaller buyer pool.
The Verdict
BEST FOR FAMILIES: 2017 Dodge Challenger. It has the roomiest back seat, the biggest trunk (about 16 cu ft), and the most relaxed ride for passengers, making it the easiest to live with if you occasionally need real rear-seat use. BEST FOR COMMUTERS: 2017 Ford Mustang EcoBoost. It offers strong fuel economy (up to about 30–32 mpg highway), punchy torque, and a more livable combination of visibility, ride comfort, and trunk space than Camaro, without Challenger’s size and weight. BEST FOR ENTHUSIASTS: 2017 Chevrolet Camaro (SS or 1LE if you find one). It’s generally the sharpest handler with the most track-ready chassis feel, and the SS delivers excellent real-world acceleration (around low-4-second 0–60) with strong braking and cornering capability. BEST VALUE OVERALL: 2017 Ford Mustang (especially GT or EcoBoost depending on budget). It usually balances purchase price, availability, aftermarket support, resale strength, and day-to-day usability better than the others, while still delivering genuine sports-car performance in GT form.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable, 2017 Ford Mustang or 2017 Chevrolet Camaro?
Both vehicles have their strengths. Check our detailed reliability section above for specific issues to watch for in each model.
Which has better resale value?
Resale value depends on condition, mileage, and market demand. Generally, 2017 Chevrolet Camaro tends to hold value well.
Which is better for towing?
Neither vehicle is designed primarily for towing. Check manufacturer specs for light towing capabilities.
Get Your Complete Owner's Guide
Create a personalized guidebook for any of these vehicles with detailed maintenance schedules, specs, and more.
Create Your GuidebookRelated Comparisons
2018 Ford Mustang, 2018 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2018 Dodge Challenger Comparison - Which Should You Buy?
sports • three way
2019 Ford Mustang, 2019 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2019 Dodge Challenger Comparison - Which Should You Buy?
sports • three way
2020 Ford Mustang, 2020 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2020 Dodge Challenger Comparison - Which Should You Buy?
sports • three way
2015 Ford Mustang, 2015 Chevrolet Camaro vs 2015 Dodge Challenger Comparison - Which Should You Buy?
sports • three way