2019 Toyota Tacoma, 2019 Chevrolet Colorado vs 2019 Ford Ranger Comparison - Which Should You Buy?
Detailed comparison of 2019 Toyota Tacoma, 2019 Chevrolet Colorado vs 2019 Ford Ranger. Compare specs, reliability, features, and value to find the best choice for your needs.
Specifications Comparison
| Spec | 2019 Toyota Tacoma | 2019 Chevrolet Colorado | 2019 Ford Ranger |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horsepower | 278 hp | 308 hp | 270 hp |
| MPG (City) | 19 | 18 | 21 |
| MPG (Highway) | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| MSRP (New) | $25,550 | $21,300 | $24,300 |
| Towing Capacity | 6,800 lbs | 7,700 lbs | 7,500 lbs |
| Payload Capacity | 1,440 lbs | 1,574 lbs | 1,860 lbs |
Overview
The 2019 Toyota Tacoma, 2019 Chevrolet Colorado, and 2019 Ford Ranger are commonly cross-shopped because they target the same midsize-truck buyer who wants everyday usability plus legitimate towing and off-road capability. Tacoma appeals to buyers prioritizing long-term durability, off-road trims (TRD Off-Road/Pro), and strong resale value. Colorado offers the widest powertrain spread (including a diesel) and a more “full-size-truck-like” road feel in certain trims. Ranger targets drivers who want strong turbo torque, confident towing, and a more modern powertrain feel than some rivals. Key decision factors usually come down to engine preference (V6 vs turbo vs diesel), ride/handling, cab/bed configuration needs, and total cost of ownership. HEAD-TO-
Performance Comparison
In real-world driving, the Ranger’s 2.3L turbo stands out for low- and mid-range torque; it feels quick around town and pulls confidently when merging or climbing grades. Typical 0–60 mph times for a 2019 Ranger are in the mid-6-second range (often around 6.5–6.8 seconds in independent testing), which is strong for the segment. The Colorado with the 3.6L V6 is often similarly quick, typically landing in the mid-6 to low-7-second range depending on cab/4WD; it also has a broad powerband and can feel more responsive at higher rpm than the Tacoma V6. The Tacoma V6 tends to be a bit slower in many tests (often low-7-second to mid-7-second 0–60 mph results), and its transmission calibration can “hunt” for gears on hills, which affects perceived responsiveness more than raw output. Handling and ride differ notably. Tacoma has a rugged, off-road-ready feel, but the steering can feel less precise on-center and the ride can be busier on broken pavement, especially on TRD-oriented setups. Colorado generally feels the most settled and “grown-up” on-road in mainstream trims, with good steering weight and a controlled ride that makes it easy to drive long distances. Ranger is composed and confident, with a stable highway demeanor; it can feel a touch firmer than Colorado on certain impacts, but the powertrain’s torque makes it feel effortless in daily use. Off-road, Tacoma’s trim lineup and aftermarket support are major advantages, while Colorado ZR2 is a standout for serious off-road hardware (front and rear lockers available, DSSV dampers). Ranger FX4 is capable but not as specialized as Tacoma TRD Pro or Colorado ZR2.
Reliability & Common Issues
2019 Toyota Tacoma - Automatic transmission shift behavior: Some owners report inconsistent shifting/gear hunting and delayed downshifts, often noticeable early in ownership and persisting through higher mileage; updates can help but it’s a common complaint. - Rear differential seepage or axle seal leaks: Not universal, but reports tend to appear as mileage climbs (often 30,000–80,000 miles). - Interior/infotainment quirks: Entune-era head units can be slow or glitchy (Bluetooth connectivity, screen responsiveness), more annoyance than failure. 2019 Chevrolet Colorado - 8-speed automatic shudder (gas V6 with 8L45): A well-known issue in 2017–2019 GM trucks where light-throttle vibration/shudder can occur; fluid changes and updated service procedures often help, but some vehicles experience repeat symptoms (commonly reported from 10,000–60,000 miles). - Diesel emissions-system complexity (2.8 Duramax): EGR/DPF-related issues can occur over time, especially with frequent short trips; problems are more likely as mileage accumulates (often 50,000+ miles) and repairs can be expensive. - Electrical/infotainment and sensor complaints: Intermittent camera, parking sensor, or touchscreen issues are reported, typically sporadic rather than systemic failures. 2019 Ford Ranger - 10-speed automatic shift quality: Some owners report harsh or abrupt shifts or learning-related odd behavior; it may improve after adaptive learning cycles, but complaints can persist in some trucks (often noticed from low mileage through mid-life). - Turbo-related drivability concerns: Occasional reports of hesitation, boost leak symptoms, or sensor-related check-engine lights; not widespread but can show up by 20,000–70,000 miles. - Fit-and-finish/trim and rattles: Interior rattles and weatherstrip noise are common owner complaints over time, usually nuisance issues rather than reliability-ending faults.
Interior & Features
Tacoma’s interior is functional and durable, with simple controls and good visibility, but it can feel dated compared with the others in materials and screen presentation. Crew Cab space is adequate for adults, though rear-seat legroom is not class-leading. Colorado’s cabin design is straightforward and comfortable, with supportive seats and a layout that feels more “normal car” than “off-road toy,” though some plastics are hard and utilitarian. Ranger’s interior is modern enough and generally ergonomic, with good front-seat comfort; rear-seat space in SuperCrew form is competitive, but the lack of a longer bed option can be a deal-breaker for buyers who haul gear frequently. Tech features vary by trim, but all three can be found with smartphone integration (Apple CarPlay/Android Auto in most mainstream trims; Tacoma gained modern integration around this era depending on head unit). Colorado often impresses with an intuitive infotainment system and available driver aids, while Ranger offers useful towing tech and driver-assistance availability in higher trims. For cargo practicality, Colorado and Tacoma offer both short and longer beds, giving them an advantage over Ranger’s single 5-foot bed in 2019.
Value & Cost of Ownership
When new, Colorado typically had the lowest entry price, Ranger sat mid-pack, and Tacoma often carried higher transaction prices because demand stayed strong. On the used market, Tacoma usually commands the highest prices for comparable mileage and trim; it also tends to retain value exceptionally well, which helps total cost of ownership even if you pay more upfront. Ranger resale is generally solid but not Tacoma-strong, while Colorado pricing can be attractive used, especially in non-ZR2 trims. Insurance costs usually track vehicle value and repair costs: Tacoma can be higher simply because it holds value; Ranger and Colorado are often similar, though driver profile and trim level matter. Maintenance: Tacoma’s routine service is typically straightforward and affordable, and long-term durability is a key selling point. Colorado’s diesel can deliver excellent fuel economy but may cost more over time due to emissions-related components and diesel-specific service. Ranger’s turbo-four is efficient and strong, but long-term costs can rise if turbo/boost-control components need attention outside warranty. Overall, Tacoma tends to win on resale; Colorado can win on purchase price; Ranger can win on payload and a strong towing/power balance.
The Verdict
Best for families: 2019 Chevrolet Colorado (Crew Cab). It offers a comfortable ride, good road manners, and a practical back seat, with strong availability of convenience and safety features in mid-to-high trims. If you prioritize rear-seat comfort and daily-driver refinement, Colorado has an edge. Best for commuters: 2019 Ford Ranger (2WD or 4WD depending on climate). The 2.3L turbo provides effortless torque with competitive MPG (around 21/26 mpg in 2WD) and strong passing power, making it easy to live with in traffic and on highways. Best for enthusiasts: Depends on the type of enthusiasm. For off-road community support and long-term modding, the 2019 Toyota Tacoma (TRD Off-Road/TRD Pro) is the easiest platform to build and holds value extremely well. For high-speed desert/off-road hardware out of the box, the 2019 Chevrolet Colorado ZR2 is the most specialized. Best value overall: 2019 Ford Ranger for capability per dollar in many real-world configurations (7,500-lb towing, up to roughly 1,860-lb payload, strong acceleration). If “value” means lowest long-term depreciation, the Tacoma often wins, but if it means maximizing capability and modern powertrain performance for the money, Ranger is the sweet spot, with Colorado close behind if you find a well-priced V6 example (and verify any transmission shudder history).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is more reliable, 2019 Toyota Tacoma or 2019 Chevrolet Colorado?
Both vehicles have their strengths. Check our detailed reliability section above for specific issues to watch for in each model.
Which has better resale value?
Resale value depends on condition, mileage, and market demand. Generally, 2019 Toyota Tacoma tends to hold value well.
Which is better for towing?
For towing capacity, check our specs comparison above. Properly equipped trucks in this class can tow between 5,000-12,000+ lbs depending on configuration.
Get Your Complete Owner's Guide
Create a personalized guidebook for any of these vehicles with detailed maintenance schedules, specs, and more.
Create Your GuidebookRelated Comparisons
2016 Ford F-150, 2016 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 vs 2016 Ram 1500 Comparison - Which Should You Buy?
truck • three way
2010 Ford F-150 vs 2010 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Comparison - Which Should You Buy?
truck • same year
2011 Ford F-150 vs 2011 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Comparison - Which Should You Buy?
truck • same year
2015 Ford F-150 vs 2015 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 Comparison - Which Should You Buy?
truck • same year